Search for: "Bexis"
Results 281 - 300
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 11:41 am
Essentially, and as indicated in Bexis' book (citing Arizona follows the case-by-case approach to comment k. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
Bexis mentioned in his book (§3.07 n.2) the antediluvian case that the plaintiffs latched onto, Hoffman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:22 am
Then again, Bexis is an old stick-in-the-mud about this sort of thing. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
For the same reason, we are rejecing Bexis's suggestion that we include on our list the superior successors of the first Harry Potter film.)Finally, the plaintiff sought alternative relief -- to place the dispositive motion on hold while the parties could "complete basic formal discovery. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
Thus, the replevin claim eluded the statute of limitations and was the only claim Plaintiff had left.At this point, Bexis/Herman offered their Solomonic advice to settle the case. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:27 am
Our first ever overseas guest post comes all the way from Thailand, where Douglas Mancill of the Deacons law firm reports on new Thai laws on product liability and their possible impact on/creation of product liability claims involving drugs and medical devices.Needless to say neither Bexis nor Herrmann had anything to do with the substance of this post, as neither of them knows much about Thailand beyond liking the food.Take it away Doug.Damage awards in Thailand for defective goods claims… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm
Moreover, because Bexis was actually involved in Berrier - representing amicus PLAC - we know something about Berrier that none of these courts have picked up on. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
Supreme Court on March 30, 2011 For a "defense" / pharmaceutical industry perspective on the oral arguments for this Mensing Supreme Court case, see this article by Jim Beck -- aka "Bexis" at the Drug and Device Law blog -- who is an attorney at the Dechert LLP law firm in Philadelphia, PA: "Mensing Oral Argument In Stream Of Consciousness" (3/31/11). _____________________________________________________________________ On March 30, 2011… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
But sometimes Bexis will recuse himself from writing about a particular case that he's working on, and Herrmann alone will publish a post about the case, or vice versa. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:03 am
And in the interest of full disclosure, we should tell you that Bexis not only wrote an amicus brief on behalf of the Product Liability Advisory Council in this appeal, but came up with a winning argument: The district court overstepped its bounds in “predicting” a novel expansion of Delaware law. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:02 am
That's just one of a number of similar New York decisions (see Bexis' book for the more). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Heck, Bexis would probably have ordered the witness manacled and placed in an orange jumpsuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
At first we thought it was a reproduction of Munch's "Scream," but now we're convinced that it's a portrait of Bexis after first reading Levine. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
She probably got calls from all the most eligible glamour-boys (Hefner, Beatty, Jagger, Bexis) seeking confirmation that they had inspired the lyrics.Recently another in-house lawyer, who is also brilliant, sartorially splendid, and relentlessly thoughtful, brought something interesting to our attention: the Chamber of Commerce's June 23 letter to the Office of Inspector General about the threatened debarment of the Forest Labs CEO. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:36 am
***********In the original blog posting about the Digitek® decision issued on November 3rd, Bexis correctly notes that the Digitek MDL was singularly meritless. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 8:05 am
We mentioned this case only in passing because of a combination of Bexis' involvement with Vioxx litigation and Herrmann's sloth.Wawrzynek v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am
For details, Bexis laid all that out in his amicus brief in the Caputo case. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Mallett, 701 N.W. 2d 523 (Wis. 2005) (a case Bexis unsuccessfully briefed for PLAC), where the court permitted a lead-paint case to proceed against seven manufacturers even though the plaintiff could not identify the manufacturer of the paint that caused the alleged harm.There is a limited exception, contained in Section 895.046(4), which excuses the plaintiff from proving up product ID, but those rules should not apply in drug and device cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Indeed, one of Bexis’ worries about the Third Restatement was that eventually it might call the Hahn strict liability exemption into question. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:26 am
Bexis has been working with the Lawyers for Civil Justice to respond to a proposal that would: (1) allow classes where most members aren’t injured at all; (2) allow free reign for non-predominance “issue classes”; (3) legitimize “cy pres” donations of class funds to charities that foment litigation; and (4) allow settlement classes that ignore the rest of Rule 23, among other things. [read post]
