Search for: "Blake v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
  To sample two of Judge Rosenblatt's decisions in which he infused his dogged pursuit of historical background information, see two of my favorites:  Blake v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:39 am
Read the Comments too.Excerpt from the blog post:"Providing a great reminder that there are still many unsettled Blakely issues, the Oregon Supreme Court today in State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
" With all due respect, Professor Sunstein, I blogged through a Sixth Amendment revolution with Blakely;  I knew Blakely was revolutionary because lower courts started striking down all sorts of federal and state laws based on Blakely; this constitutional sentencing revolution had been  a friend of mine. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Three years ago, in State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
  But, another two years after that, in Blakely v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm by Ortiz Law Firm
Blake’s records, which explicitly stated Sutton had “spondylosis without myelopathy,” suggesting that this contradicted Sutton’s claim of having myelopathy. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:45 am
  Back in 2006, in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Nelson Tebbe & Micah Schwartzman, The Politics of Proportionality,  (120 Michigan Law Review 1307 (2022)).Guy Baldwin, The Coronavirus Pandemic and Religious Freedom: Judicial Decisions in the United States and United Kingdom, ((2022) Judicial Review).Christopher Mills, Blake Davis & Richard Osborne, Is Viability Dicta? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
Even though his situation was “unfortunate”, reliance placed in Basnet [2012] UKUT 113 (IAC) was rejected because Blake J’s remarks in that case are not constitutive of “a universal rule”. [read post]