Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 281 - 300 of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 9:30 am
One of the cases she cited, of which I was previously unaware, was Minor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:39 am by Laura H. Juillet
In the latest judgment from the EAT on this issue, the case of Cox v Essex County Fire and Rescue Service, Mr Cox had informed his employer that he was suffering from bi-polar disorder, but this was never properly confirmed to the employer by medical evidence (not least because Mr Cox would not agree to the disclosure of his medical records). [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 7:10 am by Michael Smith
Cox [Part V concludes this series — MS] The post Benefit Corporations and Small Businesses — Part IV appeared first on Indiana Business Law Blog. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
Thanks go to fellow blogger Hugo Cox for drawing the IPKat's attention to this note on the UK's IPO website concerning a reference to the European Court of Justice in Case C- 34/10 Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace e.V. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:17 pm by Howard Bashman
Pradnya Joshi of The Washington Post reports that “Texas judge allows abortion in Cox case as AG Paxton threatens legal action; The case is believed to be among the first to seek court approval since Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:47 am
In Cox v Ergo Verscherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854, the Court of Appeal considered whether, in a claim for damages recoverable from a German insurer, damages should be assessed under English or German law.The Court of Appeal considered two issues: first, the head of damages recoverable by the appellant; and secondly, the assessment or quantification of those damages. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:16 pm by Mitch Stoltz
As EFF and Public Knowledge told the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the BMG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 3:44 am
Judge Cox was certainly the master of the animal metaphor. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:37 am by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Negligence — Reasonable interpretation of facts This case comes before this Court for a second time, this time on the merits. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:00 pm
Cox, Inc.) (2007) __ Cal.App.4th __, and nonetheless exercised his discretion to grant certification. [read post]