Search for: "Doe 35" Results 281 - 300 of 17,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 7:41 am by Docket Navigator
Following an inter partes review that found all asserted claims of the patents-in-suit unpatentable or invalid, the court denied defendant's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
The Board denied the patent owner's motion to terminate the IPR as not timely filed under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Automated Creel Sys. after the Federal Circuit maintains that it does not have jurisdiction to review the PTAB's decision to institute an IPR. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:00 am by Docket Navigator
The court sua sponte severed two distributor-defendants from plaintiffs' infringement action because they were improperly joined with manufacturer-defendants under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
An issued patent is entitled to a presumption of validity under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Commentary:
 I lobbied for over 35 years in the Capital. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:15 am by Joseph Robinson
Dissenting-in-part, Judge Mayer would have held that the Court does not have jurisdiction to review a... [read post]
., on remand from the Supreme Court, the Federal Circuit broadened the circumstances under which a party can be liable for direct infringement under 35 USC § 271(a) even if it does not perform all steps of a... [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
There’s also son Jonathan, 35, who logs hours there as a public [...] [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
"... using the following methodology:" Post-Graduate Success:  50%Employment Rate:  22.5%Super Lawyers:  12.5%Partners in NLJ 200:  10%Bar Passage:  5%Student Satisfaction:  35%RateMyProfessors.com:  20%Princeton Review:  15%Affordability and Diversity:  15%Debt:  10%Diversity:  5% Some of those factors are incredibly lame/immensely manipulable, but I suppose I should like it because my school does well on it. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Northern District of Ohio had held that the qui tam provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:50 am by JT
  See,  Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v Metlife Auto & Home, 35 Misc.3d 1203(A)(Civ. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
Jude Medical, Inc. to decide the question: Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]