Search for: "Does 1 - 35"
Results 281 - 300
of 9,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
So what does this have to do with voting? [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 9:06 am
However, even as of today, this Arbitration Award does not appear on Ms. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
The author was Brigitte Madrian, presenting “Does Front-Loading Taxation Increase Savings? [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Ritchie, 35 F.3d 1477, 1485 (10th Cir. 1994); 2 Wayne R. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
The starting point is the first patent statute, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
Doe Run will also take steps to finalize and come into compliance with more stringent Clean Water Act permits at 10 of its facilities, including Herculaneum, Glover, Buick Mill, Brushy Creek, Fletcher, Sweetwater, Viburnum, West Fork, Mine #35 (Casteel), and Buick Resource Recycling, and will spend an estimated $5.8 million on stream mitigation activities along 8.5 miles of Bee Fork Creek, an impaired waterway near Doe Run’s Fletcher mine and mill facility. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 10:31 am
Tropp on the ground that all the at-issue claims of those patents—of which the parties agree claim 1 of the ’537 patent is representative—are invalid because they claim ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:31 am
.): 1 Complaint An excerpt: 1. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 9:13 pm
Rafael Leal-Arcas (Queen Mary Univ. of London - Law) has posted The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 133-235, 2009). [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:29 am
§ 10231.2103(b)(1).Emphasis on "solely" and status. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Gomez, 1997 NMSC 6, PP 34-35. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:47 am
The bottom lineAccordingly, we conclude that amended claim 1 is not“substantially identical” to original claim 1. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:41 am
from Ex parte Budde With respect to the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 3:54 pm
Does 1-254 (N.D. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm
SB 35 is a complicated law, and while its scope is limited, it can provide a powerful tool where it does apply. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:14 pm
In that six-year period are two “A periods,” each one year long: (1) the 14-month deadline for first office action is 3/1/03, but the first office action does not occur until 3/1/04, one year late; (2) the 4-month deadline for patent issuance after payment of the issuance fee is 1/1/07, but the patent does not issue until 1/1/08, another year of delay attributable to the PTO. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 9:50 am
Second, the district court found that use of the analytical methods of the '886 patent were protected under the safe harbor provisions of 35 U.S.C § 271(e)(1). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:30 am
And so the Board reversed the PTO's Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm
But that does not mean that corporate reputation is, or should be, directly protected by the Convention. [read post]
