Search for: "Flood v. Flood" Results 281 - 300 of 3,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2012, 1:07 am
BDW's negligent remedial works resulted in a second, smaller flood, discovered in January 2007. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:50 pm by Beard Stacey & Jacobsen, LLP
The boat’s pumps were not able to keep up with the flooding caused by a possible puncture in the bow. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:28 pm by Rick Hasen
The Summary of Argument begins: Petitioners’ expansive interpretation of the Elections Clause—the so-called “independent statelegislature” theory—likely will lead to a flood of new federal litigation that will further destabilize American elections and contribute… Continue reading [read post]
Versloot Dredging BV and another (Appellants) v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG and others [2016] UKSC 45 Facts The vessel DC Merwestone was incapacitated by an ingress of water which flooded the engine room. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Supreme Court granted certiorari in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:22 pm by Simon Gibbs
I am grateful to Andy Ellis for pointing out the comments of the Supreme Court in Times Newspapers Ltd & Ors v Flood & Ors [2017] UKSC 33: “However, certain changes introduced following Sir […] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:12 pm
CIVIL PROCEDURE, INJURY AND TORT LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE Bloomingdales, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 12:10 pm by Injury at Sea
The Elise Marie crew was able to use the pump to keep up with the flooding while they waited for further assistance. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm by Donald Dinnie
  In considering the legal cause of the damages suffered by the insured, the High Court applied the test set out in Guardrisk Insurance Company Limited v Café Chameleon CC 2021 [2] SA 323 (SCA at 37 – 41). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:40 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
On appeal from: [2010] EWCA Civ 804 The respondent police officer issued a claim for libel against the appellant publisher, complaining that an article meant there were strong grounds to suspect he had abused his position as a police officer. [read post]