Search for: "Hodges v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 643
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed and Lord… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:20 am by Ilya Somin
Hodges, Anne had a legal right to marry Bob, but Charles did not. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
Hodges mandated that all state governments recognize gay marriage. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Sargent
Born in 1882, Fujii had immigrated to the United States from Japan in 1903. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by Raymond Tran
This is not radical considering the history of the United States was sparked from the assertion that the authority of a government is derived from the consent of its governed, and when such government becomes destructive, it is the right and duty of the people to alter or abolish it. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by Raymond Tran
This is not radical considering the history of the United States was sparked from the assertion that the authority of a government is derived from the consent of its governed, and when such government becomes destructive, it is the right and duty of the people to alter or abolish it. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:15 am by SHG
’s foundational premise of heterosexual parenting and nonrecognition of same-sex couples is unsustainable, particularly in light of the enactment of same-sex marriage in New York State, and the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v Hodges (576 US __, 135 S Ct 2584 [2015]), which noted that the right to marry provides benefits not only for same-sex couples, but also the children being raised by those couples. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:24 pm by raoneeri
At the conference, he delivered a presentation entitled “LGBT Employment Discrimination in the United States post-Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Hodges: One year ago, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 5:27 am by Howard Friedman
We condemn the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]