Search for: "Johns et al. v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
 Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., which was argued last October and presents the question of whether the “first sale doctrine” under the Copyright Act applies to copyrighted works made and legally purchased outside the United States and then imported into the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
The brief of Whealan et al. included the text:Research universities and small biotechnology companies will be disadvantaged. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
John's United Church of Christ, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Free Speech for People et al.Amicus brief of Citizens UnitedAmicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of AmericaAmicus brief of Senator Mitch McConnell Amicus brief of Former Officials of the American Civil Liberties Union in support of neither partyAmicus brief of Retired Montana Supreme Court Justices Amicus brief of United States Representatives Robert Brady et… [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Sarah Grant reported the latest from the military commission in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm by David Markus
See Paula Hannaford-Agor et al., Why Do Hung Juries Hang? [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm by David Markus
See Paula Hannaford-Agor et al., Why Do Hung Juries Hang? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am by John Elwood
Railroad Friction Products Corp., No. 10-879, for the arrival of the Solicitor General’s invited brief in John Crane Inc. v. [read post]