Search for: "Kelly v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Carcieri,   the state itself, and the town of Charlestown — were united in the claim that the federal government has no authority to do that for the Narragansetts. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by James Eckert
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see ยง 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
16 May 2014, 12:33 pm by Larry
United States may help settle that debate.LDA imports rigid steel conduit from China. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Kelly Issue: Whether 28 U.S.C 2254, the federal habeas provision governing claims adjudicated on the merits in state court, should be applied to claims based on evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel the state court refused to consider. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
United States (06-11206) and Thursday in Peake v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:09 am by Sheldon Toplitt
., which boasts publishing more than 110 romantic potboilers monthly in 31 languages sold worldwide, faces a copyright infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas from an author who claims the company produced a novel in 2011 that infringed on her work written two years earlier.In her 8-page complaint, Rucker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
” The Supreme Court of the United States resolves a pending question about the Federal Arbitration Act — and its holding seems to change the assumptions both sides made in the pending Texas case Bison Building Materials. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[27]              The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
That occurred in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]