Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 10:58 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Ninth Circuit panel: Pregerson, Paez, and a district judge sitting by designation. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am by Charlotte Bamford
Lord Kerr noted in particular the procedural arrangements as set out in the Act and the suggestion that service may be postal. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:52 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
As part of the appellant’s application to work as a teacher, the Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘SSHD’) issued an ECRC. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Over at the Federalist Society’s new blog, SCOTUSreport.com, Steven Teles has a very interesting post on the Chief Justice’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Next Wednesday is Dog Sniff day at the Supreme Court, when the Court will hear oral argument in Florida v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:47 pm
By Jason Johanson On Friday, March 6, 2009, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar stated that the agency is considering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court of the decision in Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court's retroactivity analysis as stated in Teague v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
" At Volokh, both Jonathan Adler and Orin Kerr react to that article (via Sentencing Law and Policy). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Today’s news that Paul Clement is leaving King & Spaulding over his defense of DOMA reminds me of one of the big stories among Harvard Law students when I was a student there back in the mid-1990s: The boycott of Sidley & Austin for its representation of the state of Colorado in Romer v. [read post]