Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 172,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2008, 9:07 am
GO and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Overseas students could change their courses but if they wanted an extension of stay in the United Kingdom, they had to be able to produce evidence of satisfactory progress, whether on the course named in the application for entry clearance or on another recognised course. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Regina (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme dealing with the referral of a recalled mental patient to a mental health review tribunal was not incompatible with the patient's rights under article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:36 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) Queen’s Bench Division “Fair trial provisions guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights could not be overcome by a claim that the offended party's case had no possible chance of success. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:51 am
Limiting out-of-court statements Persaud v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 2:08 am
Overpaid benefit not recoverable Regina (Balding) v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Board can depart from its own decisions Gibson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:46 am
Facts In State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:30 am
However, in State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
See id.; see also State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
STATE V. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:40 am
The important question being decided is whether corruption will be given a loophole to escape responsibility.Qui tam/False Claims Act/Whistleblower laws were created to…Read more →The post Zoltan Barati for the State of Florida v Motorola: The Most Important Question in Florida Whistleblower Law is Being Decided in This Matter. appeared first on LaBovick Law Group. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
The court of appeals held last month in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
The court of appeals held last month in State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Regina (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Al Fawwaz) v Same Queen's Bench Divisional Court “There was no common standard for what did or did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment throughout the many different countries in the world. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:28 am
JO (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; JT (Ivory Coast) v Same Court of Appeal “The Home Secretary would have to show very serious reasons to justify the removal, on the basis of a criminal conviction, of a settled migrant who had spent the major part of his/her childhood in the United Kingdom, if it would interfere with the Convention right to respect for his/her private and family life. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:09 am
Here is the abstract: This article addresses judicial choices and errors involved in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 6:43 am
United States and the constitutionality of the Arisona immigration enforcement law known as S.B. 1070. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
See Hudson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 3:07 pm
Our fifth post on the impact of United States v. [read post]
