Search for: "Miller v State of New York" Results 281 - 300 of 1,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, Judge Frederick Bryan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of Grove Press and ordered the Post Office to lift all restrictions on sending copies of Lady Chatterley’s Lover through the mail. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Ray Dowd
  Noting a potential conflict between New York and California on the issue of whether a contract may be implied in fact, the Second Circuit applied the “center of gravity” choice of law analysis and found that California law applied. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith R. Miller and Laura Dooley
  In New York, the LLC Act was just signed into law, and it largely tracks the federal Corporate Transparency Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
Last Friday, Stephen Wermiel discussed the constitutional issues in Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 41849 (ND NY, March 26, 2013), a New York federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SUNY students entitled to administrative due process in a disciplinary hearing involving allegations of violations of a student code of conductMatter of Agudio v State Univ. of N.Y., 2018 NY Slip Op 05647, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn this appeal to review a determination of the State University of New York at Albany [SUNY] that, following a Student Conduct Board [SCB] hearing, found the student petitioner [Petitioner] guilty of violating SUNY… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
New York: Modern Library, pp. 113–114. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:05 am by Andrew Hamm
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that, if the Justices “approach their task as judges and not as politicians, the administration will easily prevail” in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to strike the eighth affirmative defense alleging that the fees in question were excessive, without regard to the sufficiency of the defendant's opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]