Search for: "New York Times Company v. Sullivan" Results 281 - 300 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm by Kevin
In case you didn’t watch the episode, and you may not have, even though I linked to it above and am embedding it here— —I am of course forced to repeat some of Oliver’s allegedly offensive statements, just to provide necessary context for this report of a newsworthy item involving someone who is clearly a public figure, see New York Times Co. v. [read post]
As summarized above, combined commercial and noncommercial speech that “communicates information, expresses opinion, recites grievances, protests claimed abuses, or solicits financial support on behalf of a movement whose existence and objectives are matters of public concern, [] is not purely commercial” and is afforded full First Amendment protection. [15]  In City of New York v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Here is a free legal opinion thanks to the Student Press Law Center: New York Times Company v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether, if a defendant violates the terms of supervised release, a district court may base the new sentence upon factors stated in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(A). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Or what happens when a Russian company declares bankruptcy but has a lot of assets in New York real estate? [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
AIPLA Peter Sullivan of Foley Hoag filed the AIPLA brief. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Yet six of the twelve pre-Constitution state copyright acts — Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, and South Carolina — explicitly gave the author of a work “the sole liberty of printing, reprinting, and vending” that work, suggesting that protection of copyright was compatible with the goals of a free press. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Most observers, including some prominent law professors and other members of the legal commentariat sharing their perspectives in outlets such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, Wired, USA Today, and Politifact, have opined that it likely does not. [read post]
”[10] Thus, the SEC mandated extensive disclosure of environmental proceedings, making clear that the Commission would recalibrate this disclosure standard over time. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Rules from Bruen Further analysis of the material in this Part is in my article Restoring the right to bear arms: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm by Cristina Tilley
  The statute’s immunity-stripping provisions were based on the actual malice rule of New York Times v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
Can a corporate raider use a new maneuver to install his chosen board members and take over a company? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm by Deepak Gupta
" Rodgin Cohen, a partner at Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, delivered a speech in New York last month emphasizing that preemption was mostly intact after Dodd-Frank. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by David Lat
He graduated from Penn Law in 2010 and was admitted to the New York bar in 2011. [read post]