Search for: "Padilla v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 4:18 pm
Aug,. 30, 2010); United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
Padilla v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:33 pm
Adkins, SC11-1878 (constitutionality of section 893.13), and State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:39 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:55 am
The defendant's argued that consistent with the United States Supreme Court's Padilla v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Padilla, this probably was his first encounter with filing a State Financial Disclosure form and he may have misunderstood what it was asking for in the way of cash assets. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:37 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
Martin is purely intentional.Also in this issue is Swinging a Sledge: The Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel, the Law of Deportations, and Padilla v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:09 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:08 pm
. __________ Federal Criminal Defense: Complying with Padilla v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
On May 13, 2022, in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
Padilla. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm
In Crest v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am
Padilla, in which the Los Angeles County Superior Court held that California’s statute requiring women on corporate boards violates the state constitution’s equal protection clause. [read post]
