Search for: "Pena v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm
Pena, he voted to extend Croson to federal contracting programs. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm
Gore (de 1996) y luego en State Farm v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
And in Sosa v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
Whether the opinion will require all states to experiment with percentage plans before ever making individualized use of race, or will simply indicate that those states which do have percentage plans that are working reasonably well have no occasion to do anything else, is hard to guess. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:19 am
§ 2253(c)(2); and (3) whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am
United States was correctly decided? [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
" On 25 March 2008, in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
A traffic checkpoint had a valid programmatic purpose regardless of the fact that the location of the checkpoint moved throughout the evening State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:08 pm
Unquestionably, the status of the United States as the indispensable nation is inextricably linked with the fact that global finance and trade is encapsulated in the rules and institutions dominated by the United States and - as former U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm
In Pena v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Henceforth, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
Supreme Court Cases MEDELLIN v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Gonzalez’s review The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am
Esa medida o canon comparativo, a su vez, permite examinar la relación delito-pena o infracción-sanción, en vistas a su proporción debida -con transcendencia constitucional, en lo que ahora importa-, desde varias perspectivas diferentes, pero compatibles entre sí. [read post]
