Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 281 - 300 of 3,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
See this post on a state superior court decision that they cannot. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
A California Superior Court confirmed that Harris was right in 2013, and indeed Section 230 clearly prevents the prosecution. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:53 am by Stephen Pitel
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has upheld a decision of the Superior Court of Justice dismissing a $2 billion claim against Loblaws relating to the 2013 collapse of the Rana Plaza building in Savar, Bangladesh. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
 But Justice Nares says simply that's not what the underlying rules require:  those rules (and the San Diego Superior Court rules) say that even those people with a fee waiver have to pay for their own court reporter if they want one.Okay. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:02 pm
I was pleased to see that a class action lawsuit filed by former residents of two institutions for developmentally disabled people has been certified by Justice Horkins of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
  It justified the ruling on the ground that the Pennsylvania Superior Court panels failed to enforce the federal policy favoring enforcement of arbitration agreements. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:59 am
Like every other court in New York State, Supreme Court may not convict a defendant of a felony absent compliance with the indictment and waiver of indictment provisions in article I, § 6 of the New York Constitution as was held in People v Wiltshire. [read post]
Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy delayed a ruling on the case just earlier this week, remanding the case until the US Supreme Court’s final decision in Trump v. [read post]