Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 281 - 300
of 7,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
Sheldon Roberts v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:30 pm
A recent non-precedential Pennsylvania case, Huss v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:46 pm
(Of a sort, anyway.)So, to take you back to those halcyon days of law school, I thought I'd turn it into one and let whomever wishes take the exam.Here goes:"A federal statute provides that people can be deported ("removed") from the United States if they have committed a crime of 'child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment.' Defendant is found guilty in state court of the crime of 'child endangerment' for… [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm
Additional Resources: Spires v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
At least for some people. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
In the case at bar, the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding sole custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record as was held in analogous cases of Matter of Peoples v Bideau, Pierre–Paul v Boursiquot, Matter of Ramirez v Velez and Matter of Paul v Sawyer. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 3:17 am
By now, most people are familiar with the concept of pre-nuptial agreements. [read post]
9 May 2015, 5:57 pm
If your client has had many youthful indiscretions, pay attention to whether the prosecution will try to highlight his many children with many mothers, and try to limit that citing People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
However, a federal appeals ruling last week in Massachusetts (Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:06 pm
People v Y Decision This is an appeal by the defendant from a Supreme Court judgment, which was decided on February 7, 2013. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
CA - PEOPLE v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:38 am
In, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
From Stavig v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:31 pm
In the case of Davila v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:12 am
In Ford v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:50 pm
Changes such as the child aging and interacting with new people at home were not deemed sufficient to prove a material change Here’s another example: in the case of Gillespie v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:23 am
Flick, Case No. 138258, and People v. [read post]
