Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 991
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
Brennan of the United States Supreme Court stated in Furman v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The circuit concluded Smith abrogated Remmer in United States v. [read post]
At the time of his alleged violation of the state’s civil rights statute, Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages as a matter of state law, and the United States Supreme Court had said nothing to suggest that limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court has already—unanimously—held that an economic boycott based on race, namely a boycott of white-owned businesses, is a constitutionally protected form of protest. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:24 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Phillips ruled, for example, that the principle that the state must stand firm against permitting the use of evidence obtained under torture “applies to the state in which an attempt is made to adduce such evidence” but “it does not require this state, the United Kingdom, to retain in this country to the detriment of national security a terrorist suspect …” (para 153; see to similar effect Lord Hoffmann at paras… [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am by Ben
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:24 am
See Patterson, 440 F.3d at 121 (noting that a punitive damages award of " ‘more than 4 times the amount of compensatory damages' " has been upheld by the United States Supreme Court (quoting Pac. [read post]