Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. Vs." Results 281 - 300 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am by Joseph Scapellato
While the statute does state that grossly negligent modifications from the public presentation are actionable, the court held that VLS’s non-touching concealment, in itself, did not rise to this level.[29] In addition to the statutory interpretation of VARA, the Second Circuit examined another VARA case to support its limited reading of the term “modify. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:20 am by SHG
Louis XIV of France was infamous for his view that there was no distinction between himself and the state, allegedly proclaiming “L’État, c’est moi” (“I am the State”). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Respectfully discuss difficult issues; come to see another’s point of view; imagine possibilities beyond our own short-term self-interest. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am by Joseph Scapellato
” Under section 106A(c)(2), the statute explicitly states that modifications to a work of visual art resulting from the “public presentation, including lighting and placement,” do not constitute impermissible modifications unless caused by gross negligence.[28] Mere placement behind wall coverings, then, should not constitute the type of modification proscribed by VARA. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
 The extraordinary  Ngoc Son Bui (my interview with him here) has organized a very interesting workshop (Constitutional Law of Greater China, 9-10 December 2021, Oxford Programme in Asian Laws) around essays that will be contributed to a Handbook of Constitutional Law in Greater China that is likely to become a standard in the field and an important reference for anyone interested in issues of Chinese constitutionalism (Program here). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
 ENDNOTES [1] This memo describes the law in the State of Delaware, the state in which most Fortune 500 companies are incorporated. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Frontline) Patent litigation demand over the next 12 months looks flat in the US and UK according to Fulbright & Jaworski's 6th Annual Litigation Trends Survey (IAM) L-RAMP - The role of patent law in the public interest (IP Frontline) Beware of bogus patent analytics: forward citation analysis leads to false conclusions about significance of client's patent (IP Asset Maximizer) Recent fee increases for foreign patent offices acting as ISA for the PCT (Patent… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Frontline) Patent litigation demand over the next 12 months looks flat in the US and UK according to Fulbright & Jaworski's 6th Annual Litigation Trends Survey (IAM) L-RAMP - The role of patent law in the public interest (IP Frontline) Beware of bogus patent analytics: forward citation analysis leads to false conclusions about significance of client's patent (IP Asset Maximizer) Recent fee increases for foreign patent offices acting as ISA for the PCT (Patent… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Frontline) Patent litigation demand over the next 12 months looks flat in the US and UK according to Fulbright & Jaworski’s 6th Annual Litigation Trends Survey (IAM) L-RAMP – The role of patent law in the public interest (IP Frontline) Beware of bogus patent analytics: forward citation analysis leads to false conclusions about significance of client’s patent (IP Asset Maximizer) Recent fee increases for foreign patent offices acting as ISA… [read post]