Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 1,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The U.S. purchasers alleged that the Chinese sellers had agreed to fix the price and quantity of vitamin C exported to the United States from China, in violation of §1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:46 pm by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
In the United States, credit card use is composed mainly of four cards: Visa (45%), American Express (26.4%), MasterCard (23.3%), and Discover (5.3%). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am by Jason Rantanen
Dispute Over Method 207 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) is an SDO that develops standards for testing the quality and purity of foods and drugs. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, addressed states’ authority to regulate LGBT issues; his opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States,] the infamous 1944 Supreme Court decision blessing internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
United States</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm by Ken White
The United States Department of Justice accused SG Interests of bid rigging, and SG Interests settled the case for $275,000. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause, and Lagos v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, maintaining that the case “presents an excellent opportunity for the Court to protect the separation of powers in an area where it has otherwise been skittish. [read post]