Search for: "Smith v. United States of America"
Results 281 - 300
of 686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
The question in the case is whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
Kaersvang: Marbury v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:04 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Smith has described immigration as “literally like an invasion, something you would normally think you would see on Red Dawn” that will cause the United States to “lose our country . . . [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm
Postal Service (Feb. 20): Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Guardian Australia has announced the launch of Ben Roberts-Smith v the media, a special 5-episode podcast series about the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The EEOC filed a complaint last week on behalf of three female employees against United Health Programs of America, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Just as critics at the time feared, the new doctrine swept across the national landscape, invalidating the districting maps in nearly every jurisdiction in the United States. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:38 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals [docket; cert. petition, PDF] is whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as “prior art” for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm
United States 21-171Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision relating to the intersection between trade secret law and patent law: Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Both cases involve the process of inter partes review added to the Patent Act in 2012 as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to any application for extension of a patent term under section 156 of title 35, United States Code, that is pending on, that is filed after, or as to which a decision regarding the application is subject to judicial review on, the date of the enactment of this Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
In Midler v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
