Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 281 - 300 of 1,380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
According to the Mineralogical Society of America’s Handbook of Mineralogy (and every other standard work on mineralogy I reviewed), anthophyllite and talc, whether in fibrous habit or not, are two different minerals, with very different chemical formulae, crystal chemistry, and structure.[20] Anthophyllite has the chemical formula: (Mg;Fe2+)2(Mg;Fe2+)5Si8O22(OH)2 and is an amphibole double chain silicate. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Sherin and Lodgen
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am by Charles Sartain
Here we continue our discussion of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:04 am by Charles Sartain
The question for the Texas Supreme Court in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]