Search for: "State of Miss. v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 4,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2025, 10:49 pm by Asude Sena Moya
The USPTO is seeking public comments on whether the United States should sign and implement the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge by March. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Even though the state’s grand juries discovered that thousands of victims had been abused by hundreds of priests, the legislature has refused to open state courts for the victims. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The patent is United States Patent No. 6,992,218 (“the ’218 patent”), assigned to SCR Pharmatop. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
What Hernandez actually says is: "[T]he United States Supreme Court has held that denial of this constitutional right is 'subject to a harmless error analysis unless the deprivation, by its very nature, cannot be harmless.' Rushen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Susan C. Morse
Both sides center their arguments on a test set forth in the 2015 case United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Amanda Frost
New York, however, it will generate the missing citizenship data, enabling states to draw districts based on citizenship rather than population. [read post]