Search for: "State v. Correll"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
[see Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045]. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:05 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
” Testa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
United States Supreme Court I am just about out of ways to creatively announce that the United States Supreme Court has once again had a decision issue day come and go without issuing a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
In the view of the Secretary of State, there was no automatic correlation between the desire to copy and lost sales; if the former was constrained the latter would not necessarily occur. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:04 pm
In Insurance Institute of Michigan, et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
There has been a rapid increase in the number of hospice agencies with no clear correlation to increased need. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 7:23 pm
Florida courts have interpreted this language more liberally than the correlative federal rule. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
BPI Sports, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:58 pm
In Garvin v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:45 pm
The Court’s decision in June Medical v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Moreover, Roberts' opinion did not indicate a correlation or mechanism by which the bag-lifting activity caused any, let alone all, of the injuries diagnosed. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Moreover, Roberts' opinion did not indicate a correlation or mechanism by which the bag-lifting activity caused any, let alone all, of the injuries diagnosed. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Massachusetts In Minuteman Health Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
So stated, it deemed the treatment to be patent eligible. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
