Search for: "State v. Nails"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
Not a good sign for the other side.So went Premo v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:46 pm
District Court for the Western District of Washington against the Department of State’s change which would have compelled the government to accept adjustment of status applications from those individuals who would have been eligible to submit applications based on the originally published visa bulletin (Chintan Mehta et al. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:38 am
In the recent case of Tolman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:19 pm
Gucci already successfully shut down the counterfeit website, but it remains on the warpath, looking to nail more defendants. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:06 pm
Simply stated, a reasonable person would be immediately aware of the obvious risks of this conduct. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
In my view, Justice Jacobs nails this in Pubco. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
Carson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
On April 9, the Texas Supreme Court granted review in Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:23 am
The courts are still able to smoke out some the fast ones that law enforcement will pull in trying to get a suspect to make an admissible confession.The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:41 pm
So after leafing through the majority opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
” (citing Weather Underground, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 10:30 am
In People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Nov. 23, 2010) (unpublished) (allowing recovery of liquidated damages under both FLSA and state law because the provisions “serve different purposes—the FLSA damages are compensatory and the [state law] damages serve a punitive purpose”); Do Yea Kim v. 167 Nail Plaza, No. 05 CV 8560 (GBD), 2008 WL 2676598, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Nov. 23, 2010) (unpublished) (allowing recovery of liquidated damages under both FLSA and state law because the provisions “serve different purposes—the FLSA damages are compensatory and the [state law] damages serve a punitive purpose”); Do Yea Kim v. 167 Nail Plaza, No. 05 CV 8560 (GBD), 2008 WL 2676598, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
It’s another small nail into what I hope is the coffin of Calder, my least-favorite Supreme Court case of all time. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:48 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:01 pm
In a case arising in Western Pennsylvania, Prowel v. [read post]
