Search for: "State v. Piper"
Results 281 - 300
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
DLA Piper has a summary here, and Bret Wilson here. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
In response to the debate the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Gareth Johnson) told the House that these matters would be dealt with in legislation which, he said, was being drafted. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 2:16 pm
Note that in Buchanan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
v=dwTQ_U3p5Wc&t=334s and scientific literature at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811917305268 or https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2489204/. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
DLA Piper also covers the adequacy decision here. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
I know that case well because it was important to one of my prior cases, representing Church & Dwight, when I was with DLA Piper. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
I know that case well because it was important to one of my prior cases, representing Church & Dwight, when I was with DLA Piper. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
Looking more closely at Rader’s opinion, Rader brings us back to the basics by stating that in order to invoke the EMVR: The patented components must be the basis for customer demand for the entire machine including the parts beyond the claimed invention, Fonar Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
(Hat tips: Clark Lindsey.)Speaking of COTS, this blog is not Space War Probe: But the third quarter issue of MilsatMagazine focuses on COTS business.Newspace and the "Netscape moment": Leonard David overviews things (Space News).V-Prize visions: Zip over to lawyer and great guy Jack Kennedy's Spaceports, for v-cool news on the V-Prize challenge. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am
U.S. v Averette (1970) significantly changed its applicability, as the Court of Military Appeals decided that the UCMJ only applied to civilians in times of formally declared war. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Bush v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm
Anna / W&C: On build v buy. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:03 am
Business groups applauded the ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:11 pm
Tire Stores Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The FTC has lamented post-merger price hikes for life sustaining drugs (see FTC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
DLA Piper made a summary of the hearings, with six take aways, including points such as ‘it seems that the UPC will handle PI cases with the pace that we know from national (e.g. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:17 am
Attorney Alex V. [read post]
