Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 281 - 300
of 4,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In the event the federal Merit Systems Protection Board finds that the individual "has been appointed within 18 months after his [or her] removal to an office or employment in the same state [or] in a state or local agency ... which does not receive loans or grants from a Federal agency, the Board shall make and certify to the appropriate Federal agency an order requiring that agency to withhold from its loans or grants to the state or local agency… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In the event the federal Merit Systems Protection Board finds that the individual "has been appointed within 18 months after his [or her] removal to an office or employment in the same state [or] in a state or local agency ... which does not receive loans or grants from a Federal agency, the Board shall make and certify to the appropriate Federal agency an order requiring that agency to withhold from its loans or grants to the state or local agency… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Such is the case in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
(Stockton Civic Theatre v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
We've been tracking the status of Lopez Torres v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
Board of Education and bring back the days of Plessy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:31 am
In its petition for rehearing en banc, the Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment argues that the SEC’s approval of what AFBR calls a discriminatory rule is unconstitutional and that the rule is not justified just because some industry participants want more information about board demographics (Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:18 am
Although the employee was not engaged in the practice of nursing, the stated policy concern applied equally to her. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:23 am
Haaland v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy’s June 2011 opinion in Bond v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
Marion County Election Board (2008). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:08 am
Moore v British Waterways Board [2012] EWHC 182 (Ch) – read judgment From time to time, the courts are called upon to explain who holds the power to order people about, and why they have it. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm
" Here, plaintiffs challenged a series of drastic across-the-board reductions in Medicaid reimbursement rates by California, allegedly in violation of the Medicaid Act's "equal access" mandate. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
Board of Education decision that declared school segregation illegal and struck down the system of "separate but equal'' public schools. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
” As the court in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:00 am
” As the court in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
No, (probably) said the Appellate Division, First Department, in its April 6, 2017 decision in Keller-Goldman v. [read post]
