Search for: "Stokes v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
It is worth pointing out that the litigation over this issue - starting with the opinion in Stokes v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 8:13 am
A v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
Stokes v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Cargill, Guedes v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If the Supreme Court were to rely on the concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
Likewise, I am furious at the recent Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:48 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
Florida, 16-5247 (over the dissent of Justice Stephen Breyer), five-time relist Stokes v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 1:58 pm
See Whitman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Stencil v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time, 78 Notre Dame L. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
On Friday, he stated that Iranian policy would not change against the “arrogant” United States, in comments that Secretary of State John Kerry today deemed “disturbing. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 10:47 am
If a president’s repeated lies, illegal political pressure, and the stoking of a mob to subvert the democratic process are not an abuse of power warranting impeachment, it is difficult to know what would be.Holding the president accountable for his words on Jan. 6, as part of that pattern, does not run afoul of the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:16 am
In Berger v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:16 pm
Bush v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
The media frenzy stoked public outrage. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]