Search for: "United States v. Young"
Results 281 - 300
of 4,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:20 am
The median age in the United States is around 38. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:26 am
March v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in (among others) Young v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:31 pm
The complaint (full text) in ACLU of Northern California v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
On July 28, 2009, United States District Judge William G. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:13 am
Texas and heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:02 pm
Young, 613 F.3d 735, 742 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 6:46 am
Young, 877 F.2d at 1104-05; see also State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
This was a fairly bold statement by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
In October, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the consolidated cases of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
The Young doctrine is accepted as necessary to permit federal courts to vindicate federal rights and to hold state officials responsible to the ‘supreme authority of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:00 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
A Federal Judge in the Eastern District of New York just wrote a 42-page opinion concerning collateral consequences that should be required reading for every trial judge (Federal and State) in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stok & Associates PA v. [read post]
