Search for: "United States v. Bradley" Results 281 - 300 of 554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am by Hilary Hurd, Elena Chachko
” In addition, Russia has accused the United States of violating the INF. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm by vforberger
The majority’s misinterpretation of the exemption renders the statute in violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
The Supreme Court on Friday wiped out a lower court ruling that gave the President the authority to detain indefinitely as terrorism suspects individuals who are living legally  in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
  The Court has held that some international claim settlements agreements other than Article II treaties can be given direct effect in domestic courts, as in cases like United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 If there are new instructions or legal principles included in the Court's response, and they are harmful to your case, object, citing this case, and noting that the defense did not have an opportunity to respond to or address those instructions during the trial, and this deprives your client of the rights to due process and a fair trial as protected by the New York State and United States constitutions. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
He was not captured outside the United States, he is not being held at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere outside the United States, he has not been afforded a CSRT, he has not been 'determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant,' and he is not 'awaiting such determination.' The MCA was not intended to, and does not, apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Banks look at some of the history of martial law in the United States and say that, while unlikely, it is not impossible that a president facing the situation we now find ourselves in would declare martial law—but it would be wrong to do so. [read post]