Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2015, 5:34 am
ERISA lawyers will be watching this United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:17 am
... 1948, in Shelley v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 11:28 pm
United States and Pearson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
A Challenge for Originalists as We Look Toward the Future I began by noting connections between the practice of constitutional theory in the United States and judicial practice in the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:15 am
In the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
§ 4A1.2(a)(2) is an issue of second impression across the breadth of the federal courts, it deserves more serious analysis than the judicial sleight of hand performed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Morgan and adopted by this court today. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
This understanding of Dirks was implicitly confirmed by the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:09 am
United States, it was almost an afterthought. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:04 am
Jennifer Roth, former ADO and current Shawnee County PD, won in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
(“WaMu”) is the former parent holding company of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu Bank”) and is the lead debtor in the three year old chapter 11 case pending before Judge Mary Walrath in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
(“WaMu”) is the former parent holding company of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu Bank”) and is the lead debtor in the three year old chapter 11 case pending before Judge Mary Walrath in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”). [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 11:44 am
Curtis authored the classic decision on patent law's "doctrine of equivalents" (Winans v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
