Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2008, 11:15 am
In the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:09 am
United States, it was almost an afterthought. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
This understanding of Dirks was implicitly confirmed by the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
§ 4A1.2(a)(2) is an issue of second impression across the breadth of the federal courts, it deserves more serious analysis than the judicial sleight of hand performed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Morgan and adopted by this court today. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:04 am
Jennifer Roth, former ADO and current Shawnee County PD, won in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
(“WaMu”) is the former parent holding company of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu Bank”) and is the lead debtor in the three year old chapter 11 case pending before Judge Mary Walrath in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
(“WaMu”) is the former parent holding company of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu Bank”) and is the lead debtor in the three year old chapter 11 case pending before Judge Mary Walrath in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”). [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 11:44 am
Curtis authored the classic decision on patent law's "doctrine of equivalents" (Winans v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
(Eugene Volokh) As I had expected, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Stolen Valor Act case (United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:37 am
In Stadnick v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:37 am
In Stadnick v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
This narrow reading is ultimately too narrow, in that it reads the classic association rights cases, NAACP v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am
The United States attorney representing the Post Office, S. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
