Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2018, 9:50 am
Nixon and Clinton v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
It’s the last two-week argument session of the Term, and today is the biggest of the last group of cases: United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
The Washington Post was first to report a former aide to Hillary Clinton, Bryan Pagliano, will invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid the subpoena seeking his testimony from several congressional committees hell-bent on derailing the former Secretary of State’s efforts to become President of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
Harris mandates that a wrong be righted, Garden State Equality v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:03 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
BY GARRY WISE AND SIMRAN BAKSHI Reprinted from The Lawyer's Daily As Hillary Clinton famously observed, it takes a village to raise a child.In many cultures, this philosophy is quite literally represented in the way family units are structured. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
Here's the ending of Justice Kennedy's opinion for the Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
The president of the United States has awesome power — quite literally, the power to blow us all to smithereens. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
If a Slovakian college student who is studying in the United States called the Clinton campaign with such information, that would be a crime. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm
You might have thought the case, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
Clinton, Secretary of State; U.S. (2012); United States Supreme Court, March 21, 2012 [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
And, in fact, such a challenge did occur (and the LIVA was struck down—wrongly, to my mind) in Clinton v. [read post]
