Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 281 - 300
of 9,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
City of Philadelphia, recently appointed United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Mark Kearney held that the First... [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 1:00 pm
Thomson (Administrative Conference of the United States), The Chevronization of Auer, 103 Minn. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Phelps, the United States Supreme Court... [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:20 am
Feld Entertainment, Inc. was heard in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm
In an interesting recent article, and a post at Prawfsblawg, legal scholar Mark Kende argues that Justice Clarence Thomas approves of Korematsu v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:58 am
From Huffington Post: Last week marked the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Scott, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida Mark Walker declared Florida's re-enfranchisement scheme for persons convicted of felonies... [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:03 am
Detzner, United States District Judge Mark Walker, Chief Judge for the Northern District of Florida, has granted the... [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:46 am
From the New Yorker: Today, the official archive of gay marriage is still in its infancy: in the United States, June marked the fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:11 pm
Mark H Bonner (Ave Maria School of Law) has posted The Inquisition by Special Prosecutor in United States V. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:25 pm
Scott, United States District Judge Mark Walker extended the voter registration until Wednesday, October 12, at 5:00pm and also scheduled... [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
This notice is not expedient enough to provide the United States with sufficient time to protect its interests, and is not directed to the Department of Justice -- the agency responsible for representing the United States’ interests in a false marking suit. . . . [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment, overruling its earlier decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, 431 U. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am
Furthermore, while Section 44 was “generally intended” to implement elements of the Paris Convention, In re Rath, 402 F.3d at 1207, 74 USPQ2d at 1177, it does not, through subsections 44(b) or (h) or otherwise, provide the user of an assertedly famous foreign trademark with an independent basis for cancellation in a Board proceeding, absent use of the mark in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 7:47 am
Case date: 14 August 2023 Case number: No. 22-1839 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
To prove such an intention, a party must show that "its activities are those that a reasonable businessman with a bona fide intent to use the mark in United States would have undertaken. [read post]
