Search for: "V D" Results 281 - 300 of 76,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2011, 3:25 am by sally
Finanzamt Burgdorf v Bog; CinemaxX Entertainment GmbH & Co KG v Finanzamt; Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst; Lohmeyer v Finanzamt Minden; Fleischerei Nier GmbH & Co KG v Finanzamt Detmold (Joined Cases C? [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:36 am
Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB); [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 259 “Sado-masochistic behaviour, even where it involved adultery, was not a matter of genuine public interest justifying interference by the media in an individual's private life. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:26 am
Mucelli v Government of Albania; Moulai v Deputy Public Prosecutor in Creteil, France [2009] UKHL 2; [2009] WLR (D) 12 “In order to comply with the requirement in ss 26(4) and 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003 that notice of an appeal to the High Court must be ‘given’ within the specified period the notice had [...] [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:37 am by tracey
R (King) v Secretary of State for Justice: (Bourgass and another) v Same: CA Civ 376;  [2012] WLR (D)  102 “For the purposes of article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights there was no civil right derived from domestic and common law to associate with fellow prisoners, so that an administrative decision to segregate or continue segregation of a prisoner was not a determination of such a right.” WLR Daily, 27th Mach 2012 Source:… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:29 am
Atkinson v Supreme Court of Cyprus; Binnington v Supreme Court of Cyprus [2009] WLR (D) 193 “A trial was the legal process whereby guilt or innocence was to be decided and which resulted in a final determination. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:53 am by sally
Regina (Parsipoor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Salih and another) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 276; [2011] WLR (D) 97 “A claimant in a claim for judicial review was entitled to an oral hearing even where the claims were academic. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:02 am
R (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Al Fawwaz) v Same [2009] EWHC 2068(Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 284 “When considering the lawfulness of extradition by reference to the likely prison conditions which a person, if extradited, would face upon conviction in the requesting country, the question whether the high threshold under art [...] [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:37 am
Moran v Manchester City Council; Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378; [2008] WLR (D) 112 “A women's refuge was accommodation which, having regard to various factors, it could be reasonable for women to continue to occupy. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DS (Afghanistan) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 226; [2009] WLR (D) 109 “A careful approach was to be applied when one was considering an asylum application and the question whether an asylum-seeker was excluded from the provisions of the Refugee Convention by reason of art 1F(c) [...] [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
Chandler v Camden London Borough Council; Chandler v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2009] EWHC 219 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 58 “A parent of school age children could not be classed as an ‘economic operator’ and did not therefore have sufficient standing under European and domestic rules on public procurement to bring a [...] [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:50 am
VW (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AB (Somalia) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 5; [2009] WLR (D) 7 “If removal from, or refusal of admission to, the United Kingdom pursuant to lawful immigration controls were to be held a disproportionate interference with private or family life under art 8 of the Convention [...] [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:31 am
I'd like to post more later on the Supreme Court's recent cert grant yesterday in Salazar v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
R (Edwards) v Environment Agency; [2008] WLR (D) 119 “When copies of draft speeches which the Law Lords proposed to deliver were provided in confidence, prior to the delivery of judgment, to the legal representatives of the parties to an appeal which had been heard, the purpose was to obtain help in correcting misprints, inadvertent errors of fact or ambiguities of expression. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:11 am by tracey
Ackerman v Ackerman and others; [2011] EWHC 3428 (Ch);  [2011] WLR (D)  399 “The test for materiality in cases where an expert, appointed to make a determination, was alleged to have departed from his express or implied procedural instructions including an obligation of fairness was that: (a) if the decision was inevitable, it would not be material; (b) whether a determination was otherwise invalidated depended upon all the circumstances of the case,… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:08 am by tracey
Regina v Gul (Hamesh): [2012] EWCA Crim 1761;  [2012] WLR (D)  245 “Where a defendant was sent for trial to the Crown Court on an indictable only offence but no such offence was included in the indictment when it was signed and the procedure to determine mode of trial was not followed such non-compliance with those procedural requirements would not result in the proceedings being a nullity where the defendant was able to cure any defect in the process… [read post]