Search for: "WARREN v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Argument analysis: Justices express skepticism over using legislative motive in pre-emption analysis
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
Warren, which concerns the largest uranium deposit in the United States, located in south-central Virginia. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court Decision delivered by Chief Justice Earl Warren. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:38 pm
Twenty years ago this week, Warren McCleskey, an African-American man convicted of killing a white police officer in Atlanta, was executed in the state of Georgia. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 7:30 pm
First, Judge Newsom joined the majority opinion of Judge Jill Pryor in Warren v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am
Warren, 587 U. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:03 am
Marco Rubio, Elizabeth Warren team up on federal bill to curb practice of yanking occupational licenses over unpaid student debt [Eric Boehm] “Pennsylvania’s Governor Calls for Abolishing 13 Occupational Licenses” [same] Licensing reform generally hasn’t been a partisan battle, but party-line vote in California legislative committee has derailed one promising bill [same] Nebraska gets out in front on the issue with a bill sponsored by libertarian state… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:58 pm
Warren M. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
In the case Batson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:41 am
Warren v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:16 am
Noble v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:00 am
WebbBank of the United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:10 am
In Breedlove v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:34 pm
the Estate Of Diane Schuler, Warren J. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
In Warren Lester, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
In Warren Lester, et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
