Search for: "William Baude"
Results 281 - 300
of 378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
In addition to my short essay out on this decision ("Querying Edith Windsor, Querying Equality"), which is part of a Villanova Law Review on-line symposium on this decision, I am aware of the following scholars who also have new pieces out on Windsor: 1) Noa Ben-Asher (Pace Law): "Conferring Dignity: The Metamorphosis of the Legal Homosexual" 2) William Baude (Chicago Law): "Interstate Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage after Windsor" 3)… [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 5:25 am
Rick also flags this 2006 NYT op-ed by William Baude, which explores similar issues. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses yesterday’s order directing Esteban Martinez to file a response to the state’s petition for rehearing in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:17 am
William Baude has argued that the doctrine is not a defensible understanding of federal statutory or common law, and that, therefore, the Supreme Court made it up. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
You can reach him by e-mail at baude@uchicago.edu [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:43 am
The first argument to reconsider qualified immunity should be well known to readers, as it was powerfully set out by William Baude in a recent article and was invoked by Justice Thomas in Ziglar: ample evidence undermines the purported common law foundations of the doctrine. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:56 pm
William Baude is Neubauer Family Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
" Six months ago, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen made headlines by publishing an article on SSRN, The Sweep and Force of Section Three, in which they argued that Donald Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021 qualified as an insurrection and that Section 3 therefore disqualified him from being elected President again. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Baude and Paulsen spend a majority of their 126-page law review article explaining why Section 3 must be self-executing. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
In the former category are Bernadette Meyler’s powerful critique of the Supreme Court’s reading of the history of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause; Saul Cornell’s challenge to originalists to meet the standards of a“genuinely historical approach to reading Founding Era texts that draws on the best interdisciplinary methods available”;1 William Baude and Stephen E. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
As Professor William Baude explains, “[t]he doctrine of qualified immunity prevents government agents from being held personally liable for constitutional violations unless the violation was of ‘clearly established’ law. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 6:20 pm
Law professor William Baude coined it in 2015 to refer unofficially to the body of orders issued by the Supreme Court outside the formal opinions in the 70 or so cases in which it hears oral argument each term. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm
Damian Williams (Yale 2007 / Garland), AUSA, S.D.N.Y. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
William Baude, Is Originalism Our Law? [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
Kang, William G. and Virginia K. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 4:40 pm
“I think this draft goes much farther in a dangerous direction than it should,” William Baude, a law professor at the University of Chicago, said. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute, Jim Harper at the Cato Institute, Eric Posner at Slate, Ian Millhiser at Think Progress, Charles Cooke at National Review, Will Baude at the Volokh Conspiracy, Andrea Peterson at The Washington Post, Doug Kendall at The Washington Post, and Hadar Aviram at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
Truly amazing that more than a hundred thousand people would turn out, week after week, to chant "democrati" in the name of defending a court from politics. pic.twitter.com/EPinYVERug — William Baude (@WilliamBaude) June 18, 2023 In our subsequent discussion of Haaland v. [read post]
