Search for: "Williams v. Superior Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 4:22 am
See Matter of Stortecky v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
Wrigley Jr. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 7:34 am
ReBath-v-OReilley-VerifiedComplaint [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
By William W. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:53 pm
While the attributes identified by SCJ were relevant to the inquiry and might weaken the case for deceptiveness, they did not allow a ruling on the issue as a matter of law.Guidelines issued by the Federal Trade Commission provided that a product label containing an “environmental seal,” such as a globe icon with the text “Earth Smart” around it, “is likely to convey to consumers that the product is environmentally superior to other products” and would be… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
The allegations of ascertainable loss were unsupported conclusory statements insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss, the court determined.The purchaser’s claims were dismissed without prejudice because it was conceivable that she could plead ascertainable loss with specificity, the court said.The opinion in Lieberson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
Jones v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm
Judge Cordell was the first African American to sit on the Superior Court bench in Santa Clara County and the first African American woman judge to serve in the Superior Courts of northern California. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Superior Court (Allstate Ins. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
Picklesimer has been subject to sex offender registration since 1993, when he entered into a plea bargain in Trinity Superior Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
And in Williams v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:39 am
In The People of California v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:15 pm
Today's post was shared by Legal Newsline and comes from legalnewsline.com Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg on Monday ended proceedings in a 13-year-old case against paint companies by admonishing both sides, again, to settle. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
The judges, who ruled unanimously, expanded on the “zone of physical danger” requirement set up in the court’s 1990 Williams v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:44 am
By William W. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
William F. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:59 pm
Superior Court Judge Robert E. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Bee, William C. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Bee, William C. [read post]
