Search for: "Wood v. Powers"
Results 281 - 300
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2020, 1:57 pm
Notably, Judge Woods acknowledged that an agency rule is “entitled to a measure of respect, and the weight accorded to such interpretations depends on their thoroughness, validity, consistency and power to persuade,” but then concluded that the DOL’s interpretation is “unpersuasive, [] conflicts with prior Department interpretations [,] . [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
On 14 October 2015, HHJ Graham Wood QC gave judgment in the case of Elliott v Staffordshire Police dismissing a slander claim arising out of comments made in a child protection conference. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
The Blog has also highlighted the recent Supreme Court case of Carpenter v United States, which clarified the governments’ powers to obtain cell phone records via warrants. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Code § 19-1-29.5-13, does not specifically limit the mayor's power to appoint a chief of police. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
This made the recent spat between Chief Justice John Roberts and President Donald Trump over the role of partisanship in the federal judiciary all the more surprising and powerful. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
As Justice Stevens explained in Perpich v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
I blogged about the 1938 Wyoming State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
Woods Kaley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:29 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently addressed these issues in Wood v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Lee, No. 15-955 (whether IPRs violate Separation of Powers; two amici now filed in support) Post Grant Admin: Click-to-Call Tech, LP v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:31 pm
Can you first briefly explain the landmark Court ruling Chevron v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
What Marbury v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
A number of blogs have comments on the case including Google lose ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court, SearchEngineLand NT1 and NT2: Forgetting past misdemeanors, Information Law Blog NT1+NT2 = Blogging to the Power of A Million (Words), Panopticon The other big story in the Courts last week was the trial in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC which began on Thursday 12 April 2018 before Mann J in the Chancery Division. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:39 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
Wood v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
” Recapping Tuesday’s oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:29 am
Commentary supporting the two families challenging the mandate comes from Matt Bowman (who represents the Hahn family in Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Fiala v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Bandemer, although the court sidestepped an earlier opportunity to address the question in 1932 in Wood v. [read post]
