Search for: "Angel v. State" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2010, 10:03 am by Rex Gradeless
Strickland, Esq., Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 2029 Century Park East, Los Angeles, CA 90067. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Supreme Court - United States - Barack Obama - President - John Roberts [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am by Bill Marler
In addition to the Illinois patients, there are patients in other states, but the Illinois officials did not report what states are involved. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:29 am by Marissa Miller
” In an op-ed for the Daily Progress, Donald Nuechterlein urges the Court to uphold the main provisions of S.B. 1070, the state immigration law at issue in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:27 am
6-12-2008 California:This district's Court of Appeal yesterday rejected a man's claim that the state's sex offender registration law violates equal protection by requiring mandatory registration for individuals who engage in oral copulation with a minor, but not for those who engage in sexual intercourse.Affirming Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Steven D. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:09 am
  One of the first of these lawsuits to be filed is the case styled as Luther v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state law or… [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am by Derek T. Muller
Nelson, Bade, Collins, and Lee) (joined by two senior judges, O'Scannlain and Trott), and Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly mentioned in his opinion that the Ninth Circuit’s decision was rendered over the dissenting views of at least 12 members of that court.The second is United States v. [read post]