Search for: "Long v. Superior Court"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 3,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
The ARB agreed with the ALJ’s observation that that “other than asserting six years has passed since the case was filed, reminding the Court of its superior work product, and citing distinguishable cases that preceded the Purdue [sic] Court’s decision, Counsel has done nothing to justify the enhancement. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:14 pm
In general, puffery includes statements of exaggerated boasting or vague, subjective claims of superiority. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
Yes, it was written a long time ago, but this certainly does not make it acceptable. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
And: William V. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 3:29 am
Built in 1916 with a donation from Mead (Class of 1864) and his wife, the chapel has long been the central focus of the campus.In an order issued Oct. 3, Superior Court Judge Robert Mello ruled that he would not grant “relief compelling Middlebury to retain the chapel’s original name or monetary relief compensating the name change. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 12:02 am
” In that case (Superior Consulting) the employer conducted business in 43 states and several foreign countries, which supported the court's conclusion that the noncompetition agreement's unlimited geographical scope to be reasonable. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:49 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
For example, in Murphy v U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
Supreme Court and other cases from Johnson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, David Caplan, said, Our government is taking yet another step to improve patient safety in the province. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:31 am
Yolo County Superior Court, (2005) 135 CA 4th 263, 273. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Unite Here has travelled a long and winding road to be with us here today: First, it was held, then held again, then rescheduled almost certainly so it could be considered alongside the conditional cross-petition, and now both have been relisted. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:57 am
The court held that substantial evidence supported the superior court’s and ADES’ conclusion of abuse. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996) ("if state-of-the-art scientific data concerning the alleged risk was fully disclosed to the FDA and it determined, after review, that the pharmaceutical manufacturer was not permitted to warn. . .the FDA's conclusion that there was, in effect, no known risk is controlling"); Kelso v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm
The Court said that workers were employees so long as one of the following criteria were met (1) they were under the control of the employer; (2) the worker was performing work on the company’s business: (3) the workers were not independent trades people. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 2:23 am
In Gates v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 8:26 am
The superior court agreed and granted summary judgment for the defense. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:53 am
State v. [read post]
