Search for: "People v. House" Results 2981 - 3000 of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 5:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Long story short, (long story is here), Siller was one of three people who robbed an elderly woman’s house; in the course of the robbery, she was beaten severely. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
  The number of people who have the horsepower and reputation to truly deserve a Supreme Court appointment is pretty small. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 7:59 am by ACLU
The Biden-Harris administration ordered federal agencies to protect LGBTQ people against discrimination by ensuring that the Supreme Court’s historic decision in Bostock v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
At the time of Mrs H's death, only one of the people who comprised 'the tenant' had died. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
At the time of Mrs H's death, only one of the people who comprised 'the tenant' had died. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:35 am by Aoife Nolan
In a landmark decision, Communication 296/05, Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) v The Sudan, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights ruled on a communication centring on allegations of a wide range of human rights violations committed by the Sudanese government and non-state actors against the people of Darfur. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
12 Jun 2025, 10:06 pm by David Super
  This raises a host of constitutional questions:  among other things, it is very much “a gun to the head” of the kind the Supreme Court held unconstitutional in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:22 am by Tessa Shepperson
Its all the fault of the people who drafted up the act. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm by Reference Staff
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]