Search for: "Deputy v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 5,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:57 am
In a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
., v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm
Enfield have not fallen foul of the principles enunciated by Lord Dyson in R(Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2012) 1 AC 245. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
“Stewards” of personal data should expect demanding requirements but with the hope for a federal standard that could lead to greater harmonization of the existing state-by-state patchwork. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:17 pm
Home Depot U.S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
Initially the deputy solicitor general, Edwin S. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am
"Obama Nominates a Deputy Counsel for Solicitor General," by Charlie Savage for the New York Times. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
States can no longer pretend not to know this. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
On cert, the deputies ask (among other things): “whether the Ninth Circuit’s ‘provocation’ rule should be barred as it conflicts with Graham v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 9:59 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Wednesday heard argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm
Section 10(j) Injunctive Relief: Memorandum GC 24-05, previously covered here, which implored all Regional Offices to continue “aggressively seek[ing] Section 10(j) injunctions,” despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
Suggesting that it “would be an understatement in the extreme to call the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 9:53 am
Brookview Holdings v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
From Magistrate Judge Robert Norway's report and recommendation in Frank v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
The first morning of the term showed a welcome moment of camaraderie on the bench, as justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum seemed to join in their skepticism of the government’s position in Peter v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:20 pm
The City prepared a mitigated negative declaration for the project and its Deputy Advisory Agency approved the vesting tentative map for the subdivision, under its authority pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act and City regulations, in March 2020. [read post]
