Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 5,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2023, 9:04 am
The appeals court in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm
Rainy Sky S.A. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:20 am
In Williams v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
I wrote last November about a libel verdict in Cody v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
Deborah White, the president and general counsel of the Retail Litigation Center, an industry group that filed an amicus brief on the side of the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.R. v. [read post]
Unconstitutional to Consider Husband’s Refusal to Give Religious Divorce (Get) When Granting Support
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
In Avitzur v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
It started with the Second Circuit’s decision in Kiobel, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:37 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:02 am
Beyond this, the applicant provide no further information beyond stating that she felt this treatment was grossly unfair. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:38 am
So far, three Nokia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 3:13 pm
TransCanada Hydro Northeast v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:09 am
He left us a few years back and went first to the General Jurisdiction and then to the Family Division where he serves today.He will tell you that his favorite case ever sitting as a Judge was the case of State of Florida v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
Khan’s felt religious beliefs with regard to the hajj.] [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:59 pm
The Supreme Court relied on its 1995 decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
This was based upon his analysis of the law of all of the other states. [read post]
