Search for: "Land v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 13,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2018, 7:26 am
In Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:38 am
In Bilesky v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
You're a resident on the lands of the taxing sovereign. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:59 pm
See Borough of Ridgewood v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm
Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:15 am
On 12 January 2022, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed FirstPort’s the appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), and overruled the decision of the Court of Appeal in Gala Unity Ltd v Ariadne Road RTM Co Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 1372. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:53 pm
In Alleman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:18 am
” McHugh v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 3:02 am
The authors analyze the multi-layered land use planning laws in Hawaii, the state Water Code (Haw. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:16 am
Coupled with the suggestion that the state will spend less in 2014 and 2015 to "incarcerate felons" than it did in 2013 - despite rising healthcare and food costs and guard shortages stemming from low pay - these budget figures appear to come straight out of la la land. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Immigration lawyers, reeling from yesterday’s defeat in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:26 pm
On 30th September 2011 in State of Haryana v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm
Wil Wilkins, one of the plaintiffs in Wilkins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 9:29 am
Marksbury v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
"* The Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Clause 2, provides: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
State, which reversed the Court of Appeals' disposition. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:12 pm
In Walton County v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 2:07 pm
First, whether the continuation of an existing use of state land -- although processing a new product in lesser quantities -- qualified as a "use" of state land within the meaning of § 343-5. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 10:30 am
Most recently, in Arizona v. [read post]
