Search for: "Shields v. Shields"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 6,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 8:55 am
The court rejected the defendants’ argument that their interpretation of the business-to-business exemption was consistent with the industry usage of the term, the FTC’s published regulatory intent, and congressional intent.The texts of the April 7, 2010, order and permanent injunction in FTC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:27 am
The answer is complicated by a long line of New York case precedent, most notably Weisman v Awnair Corp. decided by New York’s highest court in 1957, holding that a partnership may not exist where the business is conducted in corporate form, and parties may not be partners between themselves while using the corporate shield to protect themselves against personal liability. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:06 am
In Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:39 am
" In loco parentis found its way to the Second Circuit in a tragic case involving young students who died from an accident on a lake at Paul Smith College in upstate New York.The case is Guest v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:24 am
In Staub v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:21 am
But on Friday, San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:30 pm
Bergey's Ambassadors contract was to start only after his Bengals contract expired at the end of the season.The Bengals sued and the case is now known as Cincinnati Bengals v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:51 pm
Textron Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:21 am
The firm cannot shield itself from institutional knowledge. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:23 am
To make an unattractive case even uglier, the employee had transferred assets to others in an apparent attempt to shield these properties, all of which were set aside. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 1:43 pm
Once shielded from the pressures of politics and funding, the Reagan-Udall Foundation can achieve its goal: protecting the public's health. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:23 pm
Sue Shields; Judge William T. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:09 pm
Based on a quick review of Belote v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 3:45 pm
In Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:32 am
The case is entitled Brown et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
Because regulating commerce is considered an essential feature of self-rule, the Supreme Court held in Parker v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 10:50 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
Yet, as Barbara Black reports, no action lies against it: In Molchatsky v. [read post]
