Search for: "Able v. United States" Results 3021 - 3040 of 10,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2009, 6:00 pm
    As the author points out, nobody in the United States has bought into this theory so far. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:36 am
Last month, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, in EEOC v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:07 am by Adam Santucci
AFSCME Council 31, which is currently pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am by Susan Brenner
After receiving the stolen data, [she] re-sold the information to her co-conspirators in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
On September 30, 2021, the United State Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided a much-anticipated copyright reversion case involving the slasher franchise, Friday the 13th. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am by Richard M. Re
United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell drew that straw. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
As Wikipedia explains, an Alford plea in United States law is a guilty plea in criminal court, whereby a defendant in a criminal case does not admit the criminal act and asserts innocence. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs claim, inter alia, that they incurred damages repairing the HVAC, that they lost income they would have obtained had they been able to rent the unit, and that they had to pay the unexpected assessments. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:10 am
Earlier this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion in McMillan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 10:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the beginning of the decision:This appeal arises from a patent infringement actionbrought in the United States District Court for the EasternDistrict of Texas. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm by Tung Yin
United States, 503 U.S. 540, 549 (1992), holds that entrapment must be decided by the factfinder under the usual "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and therefore, arguably not in a pre-trial motion. [read post]