Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C." Results 3021 - 3040 of 3,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 1:32 am by JR Chaves
  Aunque tales normas entran en vigor al día siguiente de su publicación (19/09/2020), lo cierto es que la Disposición final decimosegunda establece aquello de «vísteme despacio, que tengo prisa»: Actuaciones telemáticas. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges of a physician or other eligible professional if it determines that there has been a pattern or practice of prescribing Part B or Part D drugs that is: Abusive or represents a threat to the health and safety of  [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
n, Tú Thanh, Dr.Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2010.International ArbitrationK2400 .B67 2010International arbitration and forum selection agreements : drafting and enforcing / Gary B. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:34 am by David Post
[emphasis added] The split seems pretty clear, and I'd be very surprised if the Court doesn't see it that way and grant cert to clear things up. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:00 pm by sevach
  Quizás sea el caso típico o anécdota de ponencia sobre Ciencia de la Administración o Administración electrónica, para contar en ese momento en que el auditorio se aburre, para desperezarlos y que se rian a mandibula batiente. 4. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:24 pm
.- La STS de 25 de marzo de 2010, dictada por el Pleno del Tribunal Supremo, siendo Ponente D. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
Accordingly, the court concludes “that the targeting and minimization procedures are consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C. 1881a(d)-(e) and with the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:33 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
¿Modos de control y regulación del deseo, del cómo desear e interpretar la vida tal cual es? [read post]