Search for: "FOSTER v. STATE" Results 3021 - 3040 of 3,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm by Waseem A. Mateen
” Here, Foster refers to the expert witness as the “scientific liar. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In California, for example, the state’s highest [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:17 am by Cristina Mariottini
If generalised, this approach might in time lead to considerable fragmentation across the Member States. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Peter W. Martin
A week earlier the New Mexico Supreme Court decided Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Candidates should have a PhD in Law or its research equivalent (or be close to obtaining a PhD in Law) by the post start date and be committed to high-quality teaching and fostering a positive learning environment for students. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:26 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  It is not clear to me how one could teach certain major free speech cases, such as Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Amongst others, lovers of all things copyright levies are probably looking forward to the decision in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi [on which see 1709 Blog post here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from apparent copyright-loving Member State Denmark, seeking clarification as to copyright levies and their calculation, including consideration of technological protection measures [on TPMs, see the recent decision in Case… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The sad thing about this book is that it reflects the notion that the dialogue over the intellectual commons is an exclusively United States affair, which is by and large true. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:07 pm
" Debts to governmental entities for foster care and state wardship expenses are different. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
  They're really one.Heins takes her title from Felix Frankfurter's concurring opinion in Weiman v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]