Search for: "Law v. State" Results 3021 - 3040 of 156,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
Paul Finkelman (Albany Law School - Government Law Center) has posted The Centrality of Brown (CHOOSING EQUALITY: ESSAYS AND NARRATIVES ON THE DESEGREGATION EXPERIENCE, Robert L. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:23 am
Robin Kundis Craig (Florida State University - College of Law) has posted The Military and the Environment in the United States: Exemptions, Injunctions, and Winter v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm by Lawrence Solum
Paul/Minneapolis, MN - School of Law) has posted Can State-Sponsored Religious Symbols Promote Religious Liberty? [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 10:34 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: This post originally appeared on the RLUIPA Defense Blog and is reprinted with permission: https://www.rluipa-defense.com/2016/08/federal-court-rules-alabama-sex-offender-law-is-land-use-regulation-under-rluipa In Martin v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Second, to the extent there is some doubt under state law as to an officer's or agency's power to sue, or any other state-law issue that may be dispositive, federal courts should abstain under Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am by CMS
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am by Judge Alan F. Pendleton (Retired)
As a result of Gibbons, any state law regulating in-state commercial activities—such as the minimum wage paid to workers in an in-state factory—can be overturned by Congress if, for example, the factory’s products are also sold in other states. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ashutosh Avinash Bhagwat (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Sorrell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
The Supreme Court has never adopted the theory (indeed, it has previously rejected it), but recently agreed to hear Moore v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It is subject to the carve-out formulated under Article 19(2), which states that; [n]othing in [Article 19(1)(a)] shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign… [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In the standard account of Caperton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:01 pm
Godfrey v Spano, 2009 NY Slip Op 08474, Decided on November 19, 2009, Court of Appeals [Decided with Lewis v New York State Department of Civil Service] Plaintiffs in this action are taxpayers challenging directives recognizing out-of-state same-sex marriages for... [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:26 pm by Lawrence Solum
Muller (Notre Dame Law School) has posted Administering Presidential Elections and Counting Electoral Votes After Trump v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:42 am by Cody Bassham
JUDICIAL: BARK, CASCADIA WILDLANDS, OREGON WILD, & WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]