Search for: "SY"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 3,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
As the world grapples with its response to COVID-19, the availability and nature of intellectual property protection afforded for diagnostic tests, treatments, vaccines, and accompanying data is likely to have a significant impact on whether and how that information is shared—and therefore necessarily will implicate the response time for containing the virus and resolving the pandemic. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
DIGITAL SYS ADVISORS, 14 Avenida 7-12 Zona 14, Bodega 22, Empresarial La Villa, Guatemala City, Guatemala; Registration ID 68326 (Guatemala) [SDNTK]. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 4:49 am
Michael D. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
WDI Sys., Inc., 588 So. 2d 1087, 1088 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:22 pm
Arkansas–Best Freight Sys. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:43 am
The CAFC case Hollmer v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Maffei v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:11 pm
By Caelan Brady (Kovacich Snipes Johnson) & Matthew Murphy (Murphy Law Firm) Many of us have received a call from an undocumented worker who was injured at work. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:14 pm
SEC Disclosure (Scope of) Duty to Disclose Misleading StatementsExchange Act’s Safe Harbor Provision for Forward-Looking StatementsSecurities Law Securities Fraud Lawsuit Twitter The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a securities fraud lawsuit under §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, alleging that Twitter, Inc., misled investors by hiding the scope of software bugs customization. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In this decision the Appellate Division explains why the Petitioner was not eligible for including "Jarema credit"* for his service as a substitute teacher outside of the respondent Smithtown Central School District. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
Henry v Cash Biz LP et al Update Payday loan companies filed for bankruptcy on September 18, 2017 - 3 days after oral argument before the Texas Supreme Court in consumers' action against them. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
Merpel wonders where we are headed on the FRAND licensing level debate, and who is in the driver's seat? [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
In In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, a split CAFC panel observedContrary to Cuozzo’s contention, we hold that we lackjurisdiction to review the PTO’s decision to institute IPR.We affirm the Board’s final determination, finding noerror in the Board’s claim construction under the broadestreasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousnessdetermination, and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’smotion to amend.The legal matter involved an inter partes review… [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
Appeals -- Stay -- Automatic bankruptcy stay -- Appellate panel is bound by court's prior decision in Shop in the Grove, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
Budget Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 634 S.E.2d 324, 327 (Va. 2006). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
Category: Copyright By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleAm. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
The initial text of the decision in The Medicines Company v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm
A few weeks ago, after I published a blog post raising the question of what might happen to CDA 230 when internet intermediaries like Facebook invoke First Amendment protections – which civil liberties lawyers’ were calling on Facebook to do in the wake of the controversy over its trending newsfeed – I was fortunate enough to have a sustained email exchange with UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
Dan Halperin filed a “putative class action” in federal court “against Affluent Ads, LLC, and International Web Services, LLC, the creator and distributor of Text Enhance, alleging violations of the “Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (`CFAA’), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
